Friday 14 August 2020


The compromise worked out by the cabinet to solve the crisis around Rita Verdonk is a textbook case of Dutch pragmatism. First you have a general election. Then the first thing the new parliament does is vote to stop deporting failed long-term asylum seekers, pending the formation of the new cabinet.

The caretaker cabinet is not supposed to take controversial decisions, so its refuses to carry out parliament’s wishes.
Then the minister responsible says she will stop the deportations pending another debate. A few days later, the minister tells MPs that she plans to resume deportations that day, giving the impression she has planeloads lined up on the runway already. MPs then pass a motion of censure against the minister (rather than the more ‘serious’ vote of no confidence).
The cabinet then holds a crisis meeting. The result? The minister who has been censured gets to stay in the cabinet but loses her responsibility for asylum seekers. And the cabinet says it will not deport any long-term asylum seekers with children. (Is there a whiff of discrimination against the childless, the young and the homosexual?).
Congratulations all round! The cabinet has saved face, a political crisis is averted and MPs can feel they have achieved something. Isn’t democracy a wonderful thing?

Thank you for donating to

The team would like to thank all the generous readers who have made a donation in recent weeks. Your financial support has helped us to expand our coverage of the coronavirus crisis into the evenings and weekends and make sure you are kept up to date with the latest developments. has been free for 14 years, but without the financial backing of our readers, we would not be able to provide you with fair and accurate news and features about all things Dutch. Your contributions make this possible.

If you have not yet made a donation, but would like to, you can do so via Ideal, credit card or Paypal.