DutchNews.nl - DutchNews.nl brings daily news from The Netherlands in English

28 May 2025
Newsletter Donate Advertise
  • News
  • Life in the Netherlands
  • Jobs
  • Podcast
  • About us
  • Search
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Art and culture
  • Sport
  • Europe
  • Society
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Housing
  • Education
  • News
    • Home
    • Economy
    • Art and culture
    • Sport
    • Europe
    • Society
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
    • Education
  • Life in the Netherlands
    • Latest
    • Opinion
    • Books
    • Travel
    • 10 Questions
    • Learning Dutch
    • Inburgering with DN
    • Food & Drink
    • Ask us anything
  • Jobs
  • Podcast
  • About us
    • Team
    • Donate
    • Advertise
    • Writing for Dutch News
    • Contact us
    • Privacy
    • Newsletter
  • Search

EU court says GeenStijl was wrong to link to leaked nude photos

September 8, 2016
Photo: Depositphotos.com
Photo: Depositphotos.com

Shockblog GeenStijl was breaking copyright laws when it linked to an Australian website containing leaked photographs from a Playboy session featuring a Dutch television personality, the European Court of Justice said on Thursday.

The blog linked to the photographs of reality soap start Britt Dekker when they were leaked in 2011 and uploaded to the Australian site.

The EU court said that linking to internet pages which could break copyright rules can be sanctioned in some cases. However in this case, the blog aimed to make a profit from photographs which had not yet been officially published, the court said.

By linking to the photos, GeenStijl effectively republished the photographs and the hyperlinks therefore contravened copyright rules, the court said in its ruling.

Landmark

The case is considered to be a landmark issue in copyright law and other, similar cases are pending across Europe.

The case was started by Playboy publisher Sanoma five years ago. Following the European court ruling, it will now go back to the Dutch Supreme Court which will give its verdict and decide what, if any, sanctions GeenStijl should face.

The website said in a reaction that the ruling, which went against the advice of the court’s advocate general, was a serious infringement of press freedom.

Share this article
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Copy URL
Uncategorized
Thank you for donating to DutchNews.nl.

We could not provide the Dutch News service, and keep it free of charge, without the generous support of our readers. Your donations allow us to report on issues you tell us matter, and provide you with a summary of the most important Dutch news each day.

Make a donation
Latest
Show more
Russian hackers thought to be behind mass Dutch police data leak
Two children’s portraits by Frans Hals return to the Netherlands
ING apologises for discriminatory impact of anti-fraud checks
Coalition partners discuss Wilders' calls for tough asylum rules
AI and tech dominate Quote self-made young millionaire ranking
NewsHomeEconomyArt and cultureSportEuropeSocietyEnvironmentHealthHousingEducation
Life in the NetherlandsLatestOpinionBooksTravel10 QuestionsLearning DutchInburgering with DNFood & DrinkAsk us anything
About usTeamDonateAdvertiseWriting for Dutch NewsContact usPrivacyNewsletter
© 2025 DutchNews | Cookie settings

Help us to keep providing you information about coronavirus in the Netherlands.

Many thanks to everyone who has donated to DutchNews.nl in recent days!

We could not provide this service without you. If you have not yet made a contribution, you can do so here.

The DutchNews.nl team

Donate now

Dutchnews Survey

Please help us making DutchNews.nl a better read by taking part in a short survey.

Take part now