|
Wednesday: A cold day with sunny spells. Remaining around 0º during the day and frost at night |
||||
| Home | | | News | | | Dictionary | | | Features | | | International | | | Expats | | | RSS | | | Newsletter |
|
|||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Assistant Controller  Senior Financial Administrator Inside Sales Engineer Senior Financial Accountant - Dutch Customer Service Representative Native Dutch with Fluent English Financial Accountant Sales Manager for DRIVE, PLC AND SERVO system automation Warehouse Supervisor - Fluent English ...more jobs |
'Wind power beats nuclear', says ADThursday 12 July 2007 On-shore wind turbines will overtake nuclear power plants as the cheap alternative to fossil fuels, according to a draft report leaked to the AD newspaper today. According to the report by the Energy Research Centre (ECN), the cost price of electricity production – around 6.6 euro-cents per kilowatt hour – is already comparable. However nuclear power is more expensive if the additional costs of security against terrorist attacks is taken into account. Meanwhile technological advancement will make wind power increasingly cheaper in the coming years. The report was commissioned by one of the social and economic council (SER), one of the government’s most important advisory bodies, which is currently looking into whether the Netherlands should expand its nuclear power production. It currently has just one plant located at Borssele. The SER hopes to make its recommendations to the cabinet at the end of this year. © DutchNews.nl Get the DutchNews.nl newsletter in your mailbox: Click here to subscribe
Last year, California discovered the hard way that wind power is not a competitor of nuclear power. During one of the worst heat waves in California history, electricity use was at record levels. Unfortunately, the wind wasn’t blowing and the actual output of the wind turbines was averaging less than 5% of rated capacity. California’s four nuclear reactors were operating at 100% capacity during this heat wave, however. This isn’t much of a problem when it’s just a convenience issue. If Californians simply had to forego TV and lights, it would have been little more than a nuisance. But unfortunately, this heat wave produced record temperatures (over 100 degrees F) in areas where temperatures are usually much more moderate resulting in the loss of lives. Any energy generated from wind should be used to offset the peaking power produced by fossil fuels such as natural gas and oil. And nuclear should be used to offset the other main baseload energy: coal. Wind and nuclear aren’t competitors. They’re two players on the same team. By Michael Stuart | July 13, 2007 2:42 PM Wind in California for summer air conditioning is not a good idea. Better would be Concentrated Solar Power which matches the sun and would give a lot of power on the same days that air conditioning is needed. Still expensive, but costs are to come down when enough of them are built. Air is one third of power needed during hot days. wind is better in the midwest. By Ronald Lindeman | September 17, 2007 3:20 AM Place your comments: |
|
| Advertising | | | Business services | | | Mobile | | | Tell a Friend | | | Donate | | | Contact | | | About us |
|
||||||
Since wind turbines operate in average 2200 hours a year it is necessary to install three times as many MW to replace a nuclear unit running 600 hours a year. Thus not economical
By Bryan McHugh | July 13, 2007 8:28 AM