The current system is acceptable except the 'own risk' should be scrapped. In replacement, the insurance companies will reimburse a certain percentage (80% or whatever) for each GP visit. This will help improve a lot of inefficiencies and administrative efforts in the current system.

NL has the most inefficient health system in Europe, the highest costs as procent GDP or cost per capita and the service is well below the other majors.
it costs EU 5,000 for every man woman and child.
The Eu 100/month to the insurance company is a myth.
A family of man wife and 3 children costs the system Eu15,000 per year.
This family should pay Eu1300 per month today they pay around Eu200.
Who funds the difference? not the insurance company

The hundreds of insurance companies only add to the costs - it is not in their interest to save money for their customers, only to make profits for themselves.
The system needs to be totally changed

What if I voted for them based on agreement with the policies they are now backtracking on? I can't believe they lied to me.

The only way to reduce system costs is to decrease utilization and/or reduce overhead costs. More coverage is not the answer. More personal resposibility is. Prvate insurance companies should not recieve any support from the state. They cannot sponsor football clubs anymore.

For "over-elderies" (above 75 yrs of age), the "own risk" should be fully scrapped and instead, if appropriate, if yearly medicine costs exceed Euro 220,00 for the additional only 80% should be reimbursed by Insurance companies.

Income tax with different tax rates should be the only way for reducing the income gap. Differentiating prices of other goods and subsidies will make the whole tax system and home budgeting unnecessarily complicated.

Citizens above 75 yrs of age should be exempt from 'own risk' and if appropriate, cost of medicines if exceeds Euro 220 per year, only 50% should be reimbursed.

i think it should be income related but it should scale on a percentage of income and shouldn't increase at certain salary thresholds.

I am sorry, but for such a crap service I do not want to pay more.
Recent example:I visited my huisarts with a small, but really disturbing problem. (something on my face, that should not be there). He did not see it. I insisted on sent to a specialist, so he sent me to a consult to the hospital in Veldhoven. The doctor there also did not see anything strange on my skin. I was really disappointed. Half of the world saw it, they did not. I went to a private clinic and they identified the problem in 3 minutes. Today they likely fixed it - control in 4 weeks...

Have it like we do in Australia, fixed percentage. So everyone pays around 3%. This gets you basic coverage. If you are not rich, you still get everything covered, it just takes a while for certain things. Got the cash? Great, go and buy extra insurance. Done. Simple.

@ND
I can assure you my family of 5 costs system 20 EUR/year. In TOTAL. And check insurance companies profits from earlier years - hardly can call them altruistic servers to community.

If the own risk is to be scrapped, it should apply for all ages. We should not be discriminated by age, race, income or whatever. Moreover, it is costly to maintain two systems.

One can only pray that they stay silent for the rest of their term. That would be the best outcome for Holland.

If there were private hospitals here I could understand people paying more to an insurance company for a higher standard of care.
Paying more for the same service simply because you earn more doesn't make any sence to me!