Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google Plus Tell a Friend
Home| Opinion| Features| International| In Dutch| Dictionary| What's On| Jobs| Housing| Expats| Blogs| Books
 
 
««« previousnext »»»

Election: Labour snaps at VVD heels, Rutte warns of 'dangers'

Saturday 08 September 2012

Prime minister and VVD leader Mark Rutte launched a strong attack on the Labour party on Saturday, as a new poll says the gap between the two parties has narrowed to just one seat.

In an interview with the Telegraaf, Rutte warned that the rise of the PvdA is 'a danger to the Netherlands' and said the party's plans would involve 'fewer roads, fewer jobs and longer waiting lists.'

Rutte's strong words come as a new Maurice de Hond opinion poll puts Labour just one seat behind the VVD, as the swing from the Socialists to PvdA continues.

Coalition

With 21 parties contesting the September 12 election and 10 or 11 of them likely to win seats in the 150-seat parliament, putting a new coalition cabinet together is likely to be a lengthy process.

Opinion polls now indicate a purple coalition - a combination of the two Liberal parties VVD and D66, and Labour - is now a likely outcome. The coalition takes its name from the combination of party colours.

However, both Rutte and Labour leader Diederik Samsom have said such an alliance is not yet on the cards. Rutte told the Telegraaf again on Saturday it would be very difficult for the right-wing Liberals to work together with Labour because of their ideological differences. 'A purple cabinet is a long way off,' he said.

Inevitable

The Volkskrant, however, states a purple cabinet is now almost inevitable. Rutte and Samsom are shouting loudly about how they can't work together, but they are unlikely to have any other choice,' the paper says.

Both right and left-wing cabinets would involve too many parties and 'all the combinations without the two big parties look almost impossible', the paper says.

Europe is likely to have a central role in the formation talks - with both the SP and Geert Wilders' PVV taking a strong anti-European line.

Brussels

The Financial Times said in an analysis on Friday Rutte has 'displayed a masterful ability to strike agreements in Brussels while satisfying his conservative constituents that he is protecting parochial Dutch interests'.

Rutte’s combination of willingness to go along with eurozone rescue measures, but only with strict conditions attached, mirrors Dutch voters’ anxieties, the FT says.

Nevertheless, even if he wins Wednesday's election Rutte will probably be forced to form a coalition government with more pro-European centrist parties such as Labour, the paper points out.

Earlier this week, Rutte came under fire from all sides for saying he did not support giving any more financial help to Greece. 'I say enough is enough', Rutte told a televised debate.


Labour or the VVD? Have your say using the comment box below

© DutchNews.nl



 

Readers' Comments

Labor 100%

VVD sees loss , that is why there are string of news about foreign policy , terrorism , mortgage tax , else

looks like rutte is desperate to collect PVV's votes hoping to stand against SP-PvdA alliance

rutte and his party are for rich , banks , and alike . he don't give a damn about ordinary people.

check his government past policies their impact and the u-turns

Labor 100%

by the way , if i were to choose between vvd and pvv , i would go for pvv. at least wilders speaks his mind and not a liar like rutte

By dork | 8 September 2012 9:29 AM

I would think Rutte is the biggest danger we should be warned about.He has proved he is more than happy to appease fascists woman haters and homophobes as long as he get the overall power.

By jason buttle | 8 September 2012 11:03 AM

if you wait 4 more days , you will know for sure

By dork | 8 September 2012 6:33 PM

So the Dutch are going to vote for 'pro-austerity' parties ? If so then no complaints at the after effects.

By TK | 9 September 2012 12:20 AM

Whichever gives knowledge migrants citizenship without hurdles of integration like language.

By Abdol Karim | 9 September 2012 9:37 AM

@Abol Karim: language should be a precondition to citizenship even if cases of family reunification. It is a basic accomplishment for people who want not only permits of stay but be actual citizens.

5 years is enough time to learn Dutch.

By Andre L. | 10 September 2012 5:33 AM

@andre: i am gonna give this to Mr. Karim. how ignorant of you not to see beyond a knowledge migrant's ability to speak local language? do you ever consider more important stuff such as expertise and education brought to this country for free?

a phd US education cost at least $60000 and not a penny is paid by NL when a Us educated migrant works here.

Don't be so short sighted , kennismigrants are needed for this country and a little promotion to make them feel better don't go that far.

By dork | 10 September 2012 8:34 AM

Really Andre?

Even working more than 8 hours a day in English? Even when you only know English? Even when you start learning in middle age?

How many of your friends' parents or grandparents who moved to your homeland when they were adults became fluent, especially in five years while working full-time?

Since when did you become a linguistic expert?

By CW | 10 September 2012 10:54 AM

PvdA rules!!!

By Henk | 10 September 2012 11:05 AM

Andre: we do not agree on much but I have to say I agree with you on this one. want the benefits of Dutch society but don't want to even learn to speak a bit of their native language? doesn't make good sense to me sorry. and 5 years is more than enough time. I think the bigger question is how bad do you want this citzenship and its benefits.

By Bill | 10 September 2012 11:55 AM

Bill, who exactly isn't trying to learn even a little bit? I don't know these people, sorry.

By CW | 10 September 2012 2:45 PM

I pay taxes in NL. I employ 20 people here. I live here. My kids go to School here. I'm married to a dutchie and I'm an EU citizen. But I can't vote in this election. That really sucks. No taxation without representation I say!

By AD Jordaaan | 10 September 2012 4:33 PM

Offtopic: only those Highly Educated wanting a EU passport become citizens - many I know do it so they can move on to other countries: becoming 'Dutch' is far from their minds....

On topic - send Rutte to Greece to feel how it is to be the on-the-street victims of greedy gambling banks and rogue policians. It's time to give Samson the opportunity to dig us out of economic woes by investing in the workers, and not the banks.

By osita | 10 September 2012 5:24 PM

@AD Jordaaan, isn't it completely normal in all EU countries that you can only vote for local and European elections if you don't hold citizenship of the country you reside in? Besides, you can vote for the national government of the country you have a passport from.

By pepe | 10 September 2012 5:52 PM

CW, indeed you are right, didn't mean to offend anyone!

By Bill | 10 September 2012 5:55 PM

People, careful what you wish for. If there's something I've learnt from seeing elections all over the world, its that after the elections, They're all the same and have one agenda - power. And there's nothing called real change. Nothing will ever change for the good.

By Fatality | 11 September 2012 8:11 AM

@ ADJordaaan: you live here, you have a company and life here, you describe yourself as definitely settled down in NL. and you have never considered getting a Dutch passport? seriously?
Nobody is forbidding you to be represented, just get the Dutch citizenship.

By joanna | 11 September 2012 12:18 PM

@Bill, @Andre, @Dork... so maybe you can explain me why, on all the news/comment sections on immigration in this country there are all complaints about the immigrants not speaking DUTCH. But when one attempts speaking DUTCH with a local they always speak English back ?

Just a question, that's all.

By The Equalizer | 11 September 2012 1:42 PM

PVV all the way!

By phil | 11 September 2012 1:51 PM

I think what the Dutch people should all focus on voting for damage control,the damage done by the past coalition government and Rutte, the need to know that austerity and alienation from the EU together will throw Dutch behind The republic of candistan in significance.Dutch people need to understand they are an import export economy and not all this dreams have been realized with Dutch sweat and tears some are from the immigrants everyone seems to despise so much.I do wish everyone here votes wisely and with the long term in mind not this toilet paper coalitions that crumple when they take in a little water.

By amistud | 11 September 2012 4:16 PM

My reason about language as a pre-condition to citizenship is simple: high-skilled immigrants (like me) are educated people, many with post-secondary degrees. They have both intellectual abilities and resources to learn Dutch.

There are many good online resources for those who want to learn basic Dutch alone, despite a full-time career. For those who doesn't, long-term residency permit guarantees all other practical rights, except the political ones.

By Andre L. | 11 September 2012 4:45 PM

Beats me guys! Someone who is highly educated would have other options than NL. So called German GReen Card scheme started a few years ago is a miserable failure. The wau universities are functioning, there wont be any "highly educated" in NL in few years.
In fact, highly eduacted Dutch I know are trying to get into greener pastures.

By RJ | 11 September 2012 4:53 PM

People, beware. This guy Rutte is mostly plastic - remmer Teflon Tony?. All he has to do is to go to latino neighbourhoods in US and find out how many speak real English.

Then he has to pay a visit to his buddy Mr.Cameron who recently restricted foreign students. All university "penningmeetsers" are burning midnight oil to see where the next years fees going to come from. Not from London, I bet!

By RJ | 11 September 2012 5:11 PM

Too much doom predictions about if we'd leave the EU. We did MUCH better before than now, there's no reason why we'd go from bad to worse. Worst case scenario is that we'd stay in a bad situation that's still better than now.

Without having to send billions to the south to support their lifestyle of retiring below the age of 60 while we have to suffer until 67+, and many more examples, we're much better off.

By Someone | 11 September 2012 5:51 PM

It seems logical to me that if you want citicenship you should speak the language.
When I lived in Germany in the '90s I was given six months grace by my neighbours after which I was expected to speak the language.

By Donaugh | 11 September 2012 5:54 PM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Newsletter| RSS| Advertising| Business services| Mobile| Friends| Privacy| Contact| About us| Tell a Friend
 
Website realised by
Stammeshaus.com
 
EasyToBook.com Apartments for rent Rondvaart Amsterdam
 
 
Website hosted by
Qweb.nl