|
Weather
Wednesday: Dry with sunny spells and rain towards evening. Max 8-10º. Similar Thursday
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wilders trial ‘a bit of a farce’, say plaintiffs’ lawyerTuesday 09 November 2010 The trial of MP Geert Wilders on charges of inciting hatred and discrimination took a new twist on Monday when a senior court official wrote a weblog entry saying the legal proceedings should not have been suspended. A special panel at Amsterdam district court halted the trial last month and ordered it start again with new judges because the chief judge had acted in a way which could be prejudicial. But writing in his own name on the legal blog njblog.nl, high court advocate general Diederik Aben said the case against Wilders should not have been suspended pending the appointment of new judges. Judge's request According to the Telegraaf, he wrote the item at the request of Amsterdam judge Jan Moors, who was at the centre of the controversy. Wilders’ lawyer Bram Moszkovicz said it was ‘incomprehensible’ that a high court advocate general had made such a statement and said the trial had become a ‘farce’ Gerard Spong, a lawyer representing some of the people taking legal action against Wilders, said Aben was exercising his right to freedom of speech. Nevertheless, the trial had become ‘a bit of a farce’, Spong said. Re-start The trial should be removed from the Amsterdam court and continued elsewhere with new officials, he said. The public prosecution department, which itself had been forced to take the case by the appeal court, asked for all charges against Wilders to be dismissed. It is not clear when the trial will now take place. © DutchNews.nl
'Gerard Spong, a lawyer representing some of the people taking legal action against Wilders, said Aben was exercising his right to freedom of speech.' And obviously he is right. Nobody can be demanding their right to freedom of expression and at the same time, trying to gag to another. But there is nothing new with this. All these kind of 'movements', always try to use the rights and warranties that provides a democratic system to, firstly, take control and after that, to disassemble it. By zenplus | November 9, 2010 1:34 PM "Gerard Spong, a lawyer representing some of the people taking legal action against Wilders, said Aben was exercising his right to freedom of speech." By tjeerd | November 9, 2010 6:43 PM So, let me get this straight, the lawyer representing the "offended" defends the controversial statement as an exercise of "freedom of speech"??? . . . if he really believes in free speech, how can he advocate on behalf of those trying to silence it? By Alan Herbold | November 9, 2010 9:12 PM "Aben was exercising his right to freedom of speech" but Wilders does not have freedom of speech, that's why the trial is being held. As long as you have hate speech laws there will be no freedom of speech in Europe. By Anon | November 10, 2010 12:15 AM It is amazing to me why MP Wilders was placed on trial in the first place. The "Truth will set you free" is not true in the Netherlands. Truth is now hate speech yet Muslims are encouraged by this trial to impose sharia while the Dutch legal system acts as an enabler. By Catmann | November 10, 2010 1:15 AM @Catmann. With same legitimacy, others think Wilders tries to bring us a neo-Nazi regime. By zenplus | November 10, 2010 1:21 PM
Comments have been closed for this article. |
| Newsletter | | | RSS | | | Advertising | | | Business services | | | Mobile | | | Friends | | | Contact | | | About us | | | Tell a Friend |
|
well I'm glad we all agree at least!
By Bill | November 9, 2010 11:19 AM